The judge has dismissed this complaint.
From the Woodbury Bulletin:
|Please note that the person posing as Jim Woodbury failed to address the fact that I responded to him/her as "Winnie." Why not? If it wasn't Winnie, why wouldn't s/he say so?|
|Interesting comments re: iPads...But am left wondering what exactly is going to get "loose" if people get out and vote?|
"1. Failure to file a Campaign Finance Report ten days prior to the general election. (211A.02)2. Failure to report additional expenditures: print and online advertising (WoodburyPatch.com, Woodbury Bulletin, South Washington County Bulletin newspapers and WoodburyBulletin.com): approximate cost $1440.00. (211A.02)"However, I stand by the other charges.
"....she has talked to people involved in past pro-school levy campaigns and they don’t recall a similar level of scrutiny paid to their activities. 'I don’t know where it comes from,' Williams said."Gee, Winnie, I wonder???
|(Exactly whom has donated? According to co-Treasurer, Mary Scholz, it is small bucks from "parents and schools unions"...)|
2. Failure to properly fill out first Campaign Financial Report: no “Office Sought or Ballot Question” listed on Line 2 (211A.05).
| (According to District 833 Communications Officer, Barbara Brown, there were several CFRs filed on Friday by 3pm, but none of them were from "Committee for VOTE.")|
4. Failure to report additional expenditures: print and online advertising (WoodburyPatch.com, Woodbury Bulletin, South Washington County Bulletin newspapers and WoodburyBulletin.com): approximate cost $1440.00. (211A.02)
|Contrary to the FB post shown below, Mary Scholz claims the Committee for VOTE uses the conference room at the above address.|
6. Failure to post signage at 7650 Parkwood Place, Suite 270, Woodbury, Minnesota designating office as “Committee for VOTE” location. (211B.04)
|The "slander" referred to here was one tweet by none other than yours truly, MNHockeyMama, pointing out the fact that the management company of the building at the address listed on all the Committee for Vote's material (except the decals, those have no address at all), had no record of them as building tenants. Somehow, that tweet became "news."|
|Decal handed out by the Vote Yes committee - see any address or "Paid for by..." statement? Yeah, me neither.|
|This sign and another popped up in my neighbor's yard on Saturday, October 26, 2013. There is nothing "amending" the address listed on the sign - a handwritten scrawl is all it would take to be compliant - apparently, Committee for VOTE believe they're above the law. I used to believe that it was ignorance and stupidity. Now I know it is arrogance.|