Testifying at the Capitol in favor of
HF208 brought back memories of a S
outh Washington County School Board presentation from September 26, 2013. As we go forward, it is important to look back at the evidence we have collected and the battles we have fought for the taxpayers of Woodbury, Cottage Grove, St. Paul Park and Newport. As you attend district-wide
budget meetings, take note as to whether District 833 Superintendents and Board Members are using their official positions to advocate for school levies using your money.
School Board Presentation
District 833
September 26, 2013
According to Parents United for Public Schools, there are two
parts to school levy campaigns: the District Informational Campaign and the
Citizen Promotional Campaign. Minnesota law does not allow local school boards
or superintendents to use their official positions to advocate for school
levies. Consequently, Minnesota school levy campaigns are typically run by
citizen groups.
The goal is an informed citizenry but to avoid the perception of
impropriety and to stay within the boundaries of the law:
- ·
Districts must provide information about the campaign in a
neutral manner.
- ·
District funds cannot be used to promote the election’s
outcome.
- ·
Districts may use funds for a neutral informational
campaign.
- ·
All
communication is considered public and the goal is to inform about the referendum,
not advocate for its passage.
The integrity of our District is important to maintain and it
cannot be jeopardized. Unfortunately,
there is a perception of impropriety that concerns me greatly.
Principal Julie Nielson was pulled off of her job at Middleton
Elementary to aid the district in promoting the referendum. There is a substitute principal filling her
position and taxpayers are funding both Ms. Nielson , as she serves the
district on her special assignment and the substitute. It would appear as if the district is using
public funds to promote the outcome they desire. Typically, communication professionals write
communication strategies. The District
has communication professionals on staff to perform this task and once again,
taxpayers are paying the bill.
Emails from Ms. Nielson were sent to all legislative
representatives in South Washington County.
The email reads as follows:
Hi
---------: This is Julie Nielson wanting to connect with you to set up a
one hour meeting time with our Superintendent. I am on special assignment
to start the year working on the district's referendum campaign and am in
charge of all details surrounding getting accurate information out. Dr.
Jacobus has requested time to meet with each legislator individually. I
am hoping that you might be able to find time in the next 3-4 weeks to schedule
a coffee, breakfast, lunch, or any time in between with Dr. Jacobus. Feel
free to send back a couple of dates/times that work for you and I will check
his calendar. If it is easier to give me a call, I can be reached at
------Thank you for your support and I look forward to hearing from you.
It
is my understanding that these Representatives have been asked to sign a letter
in support of the referendum which will be published in our local newspapers.
My
question to school board members is:
·
·
Were you
aware that Ms. Nielson is serving in this capacity?
·
Why are
taxpayers being forced to pay for Ms. Nielson to serve in this capacity and her
substitute?
·
The District
has communication professionals on staff.
Shouldn’t they be performing this task?
·
Why are
emails going out to our Representatives?
Is Dr. Jacubus asking for their support to promote a positive outcome?
